SIPRI Yearbook 2014
I. Humanitarian arms control initiatives
In 2013 the states parties to the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions (CCM), the 1997 Anti-Personnel Mine (APM) Convention and the 1981 Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) Convention continued their work to limit the impact of certain weapons on civilians.1 The greatest achievements of these instruments have been to mitigate new use and to clear land of explosive remnants of war (ERW), leading to a substantial reduction in civilian casualties. Notably, the United Kingdom—formerly a major producer of cluster munitions—declared the complete destruction of its cluster munition stockpile in 2013. The greatest challenges relating to these weapons are violations of the emerging international norms by states that are not parties to the conventions and by non-state actors.
- Citation (MLA):
- Anthony, Ian, Lina Grip, and Chris Holland. "9. Conventional arms control and military confidence building." SIPRI Yearbook. SIPRI. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2016. Web. 16 Feb. 2025. <https://www.sipriyearbook.org/view/9780198712596/sipri-9780198712596-chapter-10-div1-2.xml>.
- Citation (APA):
- Anthony, I., Grip, L., & Holland, C. (2016). 9. Conventional arms control and military confidence building. In SIPRI, SIPRI Yearbook 2014: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved 16 Feb. 2025, from https://www.sipriyearbook.org/view/9780198712596/sipri-9780198712596-chapter-10-div1-2.xml
- Citation (Chicago):
- Anthony, Ian, Lina Grip, and Chris Holland. "9. Conventional arms control and military confidence building." In SIPRI Yearbook 2014: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, SIPRI. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016). Retrieved 16 Feb. 2025, from https://www.sipriyearbook.org/view/9780198712596/sipri-9780198712596-chapter-10-div1-2.xml
Please log in to access full text content, or find out more about how to subscribe.
If you think you should have access to this service, please contact your librarian.