SIPRI Yearbook 2016
V. Casualty recording in armed conflict: methods and normative issues
Press and media coverage of any war almost always reports the number killed as soon as a figure is obtainable. Although accounting for their own military deaths has been a long-standing practice of states, until recently close attention to civilian deaths, on all sides of a conflict, has been either rare or inconsistent. As the nature of conflict has evolved since the end of the 20th century from predominantly international conflicts to intrastate conflicts, this has repeatedly been said to coincide with an increasingly disproportionate toll on the civilian populations involved. The true extent of this problem, however, is not known.2 Nonetheless, the international community has emphasized the importance of the protection of civilians as a central tenet of both military and peacekeeping operations.3 Detailed information on civilian deaths is a prerequisite for ensuring that such protection is provided.
- Citation (MLA):
- Davis, Ian. "6. Armed conflict data trends." SIPRI Yearbook. SIPRI. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2016. Web. 20 Mar. 2025. <https://www.sipriyearbook.org/view/9780198787280/sipri-9780198787280-chapter-006-div1-049.xml>.
- Citation (APA):
- Davis, I. (2016). 6. Armed conflict data trends. In SIPRI, SIPRI Yearbook 2016: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved 20 Mar. 2025, from https://www.sipriyearbook.org/view/9780198787280/sipri-9780198787280-chapter-006-div1-049.xml
- Citation (Chicago):
- Davis, Ian. "6. Armed conflict data trends." In SIPRI Yearbook 2016: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, SIPRI. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016). Retrieved 20 Mar. 2025, from https://www.sipriyearbook.org/view/9780198787280/sipri-9780198787280-chapter-006-div1-049.xml
Please log in to access full text content, or find out more about how to subscribe.
If you think you should have access to this service, please contact your librarian.